Tackling the fallout from the coronavirus

image_pdf

by Laurence Boone, OECD Chief Economist

Covid-19 (coronavirus) hit China at the start of December and outbreaks have spread more widely. The virus is bringing considerable human pain. It is also resulting in significant economic disruption from quarantines, restrictions on travel, factory closures and a sharp decline in many service sector activities.

The world economy is in its most precarious position since the global financial crisis.

Global growth, cooling for the past two years to a subdued level, has been dealt a nasty blow by the coronavirus. High frequency indicators such as coal demand, suggest the Chinese economy slowed sharply in the first quarter of 2020. As China accounts for 17% of global GDP, 11% of world trade, 9% of global tourism and over 40% of global demand of some commodities, negative spillovers to the rest of the world are sizeable. There is mounting evidence of sharp declines in tourism, supply chain disruptions, weak commodity demand and falling consumer confidence.

How far the epidemic spreads will determine economic prospects.

Even under a best-case scenario of containment to China and limited outbreaks in other countries as we see today, the OECD expects a sharp slowdown in world growth in early 2020. We have revised our projection for the year from an already low 3% in November to only 2.4%, lower than in any year since the financial crisis. In a downside-risk scenario where epidemics break out in some other countries across the globe, the slowdown will be sharper and more prolonged. Our modelling suggests that the level of world GDP would fall as low as 1.5% this year, halving the OECD’s previous 2020 projection from last November of 3%. Containment measures and fear of infection would hit production as well as spending hard and drive many of the epidemic affected countries into outright recession.

Governments cannot afford to wait.

Regardless of where the virus spreads, the world economy, previously weakened by persistent trade and political tensions, has already suffered a sharp setback. Households are uncertain and apprehensive. Firms in sectors such as tourism, electronics and automobiles are already reporting supply disruptions and/or a collapse in demand. The world economy is now too fragile for governments to gamble on an automatic sharp bounce-back.

Containing the epidemic and limiting cases of serious illness is the policy priority.

Limiting travel, quarantines and cancelling events are required to contain the epidemic. Increased government spending should be first directed to the health sector, tackling virus outbreaks and supporting research. Complementary policy action can at least mitigate the economic and social fallout.

Supporting vulnerable households and firms is essential.

Containment measures and the fear of infection can cause sudden stops in economic activity. Beyond health, the priority should be on allowing short-time working schemes and providing vulnerable households temporary direct transfers to tide them over loss of income from work shutdowns and layoffs. Increasing liquidity buffers to firms in affected sectors is also needed to avoid debt default of otherwise sound enterprises. Reducing fixed charges and taxes and credit forbearance would also help to reduce the pressure on firms facing an abrupt falloff in demand.

If the epidemic spreads outside China, the G20 should lead a coordinated policy response.

Countries should cooperate on support to health care in countries where it is needed, as well as on containment measures. In addition, if countries announced coordinated fiscal and monetary support, confidence effects would compound the effect of policies. This would help reverse the drubbing in confidence that a more widespread outbreak would provoke. It would also be more effective than working alone. Our work presented in the Economic Outlook 2019 shows that if G20 economies implement stimulus measures collectively, rather than alone, the growth effects in the median G20 economy will be 1/3 higher after just two years. Some would say it is trite to call for international cooperation. However, in this globally connected economy and society, the coronavirus and its economic and social fallout is everyone’s problem, even if firms decide in the wake of this virus shock to repatriate production and make it a bit less interdependent.

For more information visit the latest Interim Economic Outlook, released 2 March 2020

102 thoughts on “Tackling the fallout from the coronavirus”

  1. Pingback: Coronavirus will hit gig workers particularly hard – Gigger

  2. Pingback: Coronavirus will hit gig employees significantly laborious - NewsLagoon

  3. Pingback: Coronavirus: World Economy in Precarious Position - The African Executive

  4. Pingback: Black Swans of the Same Feather – Sage Commentary on Recent Market Volatility - Sage Advisory

  5. Pingback: Coronavirus, Agile Work, Deceleration - My Digital Blog: Marija Stambolieva

  6. Pingback: Coronavirus in the Trump era proves nationalism's worse than globalism for world – Wealthiest Investor News

  7. Pingback: Coronavirus in the Trump era proves nationalism's worse than globalism for world – The American Investor Daily

  8. Pingback: Coronavirus in the Trump era proves nationalism's worse than globalism for world – Conservative Investing News

  9. Pingback: Coronavirus in the Trump era proves nationalism's worse than globalism for world – Darwin Wealth Creation

  10. Pingback: Coronavirus in the Trump era proves nationalism's worse than globalism for world – The Conservative Investor Daily

  11. Pingback: Coronavirus in the Trump era proves nationalism’s worse than globalism for world – Slimgigs

  12. Pingback: Coronavirus in the Trump era proves nationalism’s worse than globalism for world – Premium Financial Daily

  13. Pingback: Coronavirus in the Trump era proves nationalisms worse than globalism for world – Mlobi News Network

  14. Pingback: Coronavirus in the Trump era proves nationalism's worse than globalism for world - Best Trump Memes Website Ever

  15. Pingback: Coronavirus in the Trump era proves nationalism's worse than globalism for world

  16. Pingback: Iraq In the Time of Corona: After ISIS, An Unwelcome Hydra-Headed Threat | Iraq Energy Institute

  17. Pingback: El coronavirus en la era de Trump demuestra que el nacionalismo es peor que el globalismo para el mundo ǀ Ver | Heaven32

  18. Pingback: Coronavirus in the Trump era proves nationalism's worse than globalism for world ǀ View - World2day

  19. Pingback: Coronavirus in the Trump era proves nationalism's worse than globalism for world ǀ View | RSS24.news

  20. Pingback: Coronavirus in the Trump era proves nationalism's worse than globalism for world ǀ View | Politicopathy

  21. Pingback: Coronavírus na era Trump prova que o nacionalismo é pior do que o globalismo para o mundo ǀ View

  22. Pingback: How changes brought on by coronavirus could help tackle climate change - Non Perele

  23. Pingback: How changes brought on by coronavirus could help tackle climate change

  24. Pingback: Globeinfolive

  25. Pingback: How changes brought on by coronavirus could help tackle climate change – Enjeux énergies et environnement

  26. Pingback: How changes brought on by coronavirus could help tackle climate change – Mary-Elika Foundation

  27. Pingback: Changes Brought On by Coronavirus May Help Tackle Climate Change – West Hollywood Daily News

  28. Pingback: The Insurance Implications of the Coronavirus “Catastrophe” | The RMS Blog

  29. Pingback: 4 Battered Tech Bets on Investors' Radar Amid Coronavirus Sell-Off - March 20, 2020 - Lifestlye blog

  30. Pingback: 4 Battered Tech Bets on Investors’ Radar Amid Coronavirus Sell-Off – March 20, 2020 – Premium Financial Daily

  31. Pingback: four Battered Tech Bets on Buyers’ Radar Amid Coronavirus Promote-Off – March 20, 2020 – Plantingwell

  32. Pingback: How changes brought on by coronavirus could help tackle climate change | Red, Green, and Blue

  33. Pingback: This Pandemic Might Actually Help Us Tackle Climate Change. Here's How | Dose Of Viral

  34. Pingback: This Pandemic Might Actually Help Us Tackle Climate Change. Here’s How – Panic – World News

  35. Pingback: This Pandemic Might Actually Help Us Tackle Climate Change. Here's How | News Nation Global

  36. Pingback: This Pandemic Might Actually Help Us Tackle Climate Change. Here’s How – More of course

  37. Pingback: Esta pandemia podría ayudarnos a enfrentar el cambio climático. Así es cómo | Heaven32

  38. Pingback: This Pandemic Might Actually Help Us Tackle Climate Change. Here’s How – Techsemut English

  39. Pingback: How Coronavirus Could Help Change Climate Policy For the Better - NewsDay24.com

  40. Pingback: How Coronavirus Could Help Change Climate Policy For the Better - taktik(z) Staging

  41. Pingback: SpaceWatchGL Op-Ed: How Changes Brought On By Coronavirus Could Help Tackle Climate Change – Dinezh.com

  42. Pingback: Korona og klima. "Du vil aldri la en alvorlig krise gå til spille."

  43. Pingback: Central bankers pledge stability as virus fears mount, raising the odds of a coordinated rate cut - Usa Today Press

  44. Pingback: COVID-19 And The State of the Climate | 3d print ......errori ed esperienze,

  45. Pingback: COVID-19 And The State of the Climate – Finance Market House

  46. Pingback: COVID-19 And The State of the Climate – Coronavirus (Covid-19) Updates

  47. Pingback: Mother Earth Magazine This Pandemic Might Actually Help Us Tackle Climate Change. Here's How - Mother Earth Magazine

  48. Pingback: A pandemia pode realmente nos ajudar a combater as mudanças climáticas. – Jornal de Guarulhos

  49. Pingback: How Changes Brought On By Coronavirus Could Help Tackle Climate Change | Voice Of Freedom

Leave a Reply