Lithuania: Addressing demographic challenges 

By Pierre-Alain Pionnier

Lithuania’s population is expected to decline by 20% and its working-age population by 30% over the next 25 years (Figure 1). Few countries will face such a large demographic shock. This calls for policy responses across different areas, including fiscal and labour market policies, as explained in the 2025 Economic Survey of Lithuania. 

Figure 1. Lithuania will face a large demographic shock

Change in the working-age population (20-64 years old), %, 2022-2050

Ageing-related expenditure is set to increase by 3.6% of GDP by 2045, most of it related to the financing of public pensions. At 37% of GDP in 2023 Lithuania’s public debt is one of the lowest in the OECD, but simulations show that it could increase rapidly due to ageing-related costs.

Unfortunately, there is not much that Lithuania can do to contain the expected increase in pension spending, at least in the short term.

The statutory retirement age is currently around 64, similar to the OECD average, and will increase to 65 in 2026 for both men and women. Significant disparities in life expectancy between men and women and across socio-economic groups make further increases in the retirement age difficult. Lithuanian men have one of the lowest life expectancies in the OECD and enjoy relatively short retirement periods. Even in an optimistic scenario, fiscal savings that could be obtained from linking the retirement age to life expectancy would be limited in Lithuania.

Adjusting pension benefits could in principle provide a way to improve the financial sustainability of the pension system. But pension replacement rates, which measure pension benefits relative to pre-retirement wages, are already the lowest in the OECD and old-age poverty is high (25%). This severely limits the scope for savings through benefit adjustments.

Ensuring fiscal sustainability will therefore require creating additional fiscal space outside of the pension system. Better spending efficiency can help to improve fiscal outcomes. For example, Lithuania has a larger public sector than other OECD countries and available estimates suggest that wages in the public sector are around 10% higher than in the private sector. Moreover, Lithuania’s fiscal revenues are comparatively low (Figure 2). This provides scope to increase taxes to contribute to the financing of ageing-related expenditure. One case in point is property taxes, which are among the taxes that are least detrimental to economic growth but also largely underused in Lithuania. A large shadow economy is another unexploited source of fiscal revenues. This shadow economy reduces revenues from value-added taxes. Further reducing the use of cash in the economy and reducing the tax wedge for low-income earners to make formal work more attractive could help, and the resulting revenue losses could be compensated by increasing income taxes for higher incomes.

Figure 2. Property tax revenues could be increased to strengthen fiscal sustainability

Structure of tax revenues, % of GDP, 2023

Bringing more people into the labour force would attenuate the impact of the demographic shock on the labour market.

Despite existing labour shortages in many sectors, the employment gap between higher- and lower-skilled workers is high in Lithuania. The creation of learning accounts for training courses in 2024 is a step in the right direction. If it turned out that current funding is insufficient to make a significant difference, targeting could be increased towards the groups that are most in need of training.

Increasing the employment prospects of older-age workers will also require improving their health. Poor health conditions are partly related to preventable diseases and behavioural factors such as poor diets, high alcohol consumption and low physical activity. Regulations and taxes have a key role to play by limiting the affordability of harmful substances.

Immigration is another way to mitigate labour shortages. Simulations presented in this Survey show that extending the positive net migration inflows that were observed just before the outbreak of the war in Ukraine would halve the impact of the demographic shock on the Lithuanian economy. Residence permits for non-EU workers could be made more attractive. With 1.3 million persons of Lithuanian descent living abroad, return migration also has a significant potential. Since migrants of Lithuanian origin may be easier to integrate, outreach towards the diaspora could be strengthened.

Visit the OECD’s Lithuania Economic Snapshot page for further information.

References:

OECD (2025), OECD Economic Surveys: Lithuania 2025, https://doi.org/10.1787/4abf1ea5-en, OECD Publishing, Paris.